Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Canada vs different competition

Something else for Canadian fans to think about, after the WJCs....

Canada only played one good team in the whole tournament (whatever happened to the days when you'd play four or five good teams?), as well as a bunch of games against teams of considerably weaker calibre. As a result, a number of Canadian players are sporting rather gaudy stat lines that they got from running up the score on weak opponents.

But who played well when it counted against the strong teams - basically only the games against the USA? Check it out....


LAT/SUI/SLOUSA
NamePosGPGAPTSPIM+/-GPGAPTSPIM+/-

Adam, LukeF43256+521232+4
Bourque, GabrielF43694+720000-2
Caron, JordanF40224+520222+3
Cormier, PatriceF42354+420000-1
Cowen, JaredD40112+520000-1
deHaan, CalvinD20110+520000-1
Della-Rovere, StefanF42356+721012+2
Eberle, JordanF44592+424042-1
Ellis, RyanD41672+520110-3
Hall, TaylorF45490+421230-1
Hamonic, TravisD41230+810000+1
Henrique, AdamF41012+2200000
Kadri, NazemF433614+420220-3
Kozun, BrandonF42460+720000-1
McMillan, BrandonF44370+420110+2
Nemisz, GregF40000+121010-1
Pietrangelo, AlexD428102+92112120
Scandella, MarcoD41122+520110+2
Schenn, BraydenF42464+720220+1
Teubert, ColtenD40110+5200000


LAT/SUI/SLOUSA
NameGPMinSV%GAAWL GPMinSV%GAAWL
Allen, Jake3180.9780.3330 2111.4.8394.8500
Jones, Martin160.9262.0010 118.1.8893.3101

You can see some players padded their stats against the patsies and did little against the tough American team, while some other players picked up their game when it counted. Obviously this is only stats-based and that's not always a good way to tell how well somebody played, but it's something to look at anyway.

Most glaring example is probably Gabriel Bourque, who racked up 9 points in 4 games against the weaklings but was a big fat zero and a -2 against the USA. For that matter, his linemates Brandon Kozun and Patrice Cormier weren't any better.

Others who fared a lot less well when the games were tough - Ellis, Pietrangelo, Kadri, Allen.

On the flip side, Luke Adam stands out as a player who did better against the tougher competition than against the weaklings. So did Caron, Eberle, McMillan, and Scandella.


2 comments:

Whats_A_Silver? said...

Since you are basing everything here on points, and saying who played good against the USA ... not a major Pietrangelo fan or anything, but .... Pietrangelo was the top scoring D-man for Canada vs. the USA ... infact his two points equals the total points put up by the other D-men combined. His SH goal against the USA on New Years Eve to tie the game up with 4 minutes left was a thing of beauty. His shot on the 2nd last play of the game? It was the right thing to do, the most natural thing to do, that was the play - I think anyone who plays hockey would have made the same decision (Rod Langway would have even taken the shot) ... if there didn't happen to be a 13 foot rebound, which is odd in itself - things may have turned out different. Always lot's of "what ifs". Another thing, Canada's 3rd & 4th lines that put up great numbers in the easy games, when it came to the big games, they were what they were, 3rd & 4th lines - less ice time, no PP time, and not expected to contribute on the scoreboard that much ... in the big games, Canada had two lines, the Kadri line and the Schenn line. Personally, I didn't like the look of this team from day one - something just didn't seem right. I thought Kadri was horrible, and if he's one of the best that you can put on the ice in the dieing minutes of a game, and is eating up lot's of offensive minutes, your in trouble. When everybody was knocking Schroeder (probably USA's 5th or 6th best forward this tournament) for the way he was not playing up to par, he was still playing 10 times better than Kadri was, and Kadri seemed to be in the coaches top 3. Hall looked like a puck hog playing Pee Wee hockey, and early in the game the goaltending sucked when it needed to be good. Maybe Canada and the media should stop playing up the "Hero" label given to players like Eberle ... then some of these kids wouldn't have tried to be Canada's next WJC hero .... instead they would have played more of a team game, and let the "team" be the hero!!

Anonymous said...

Great Comment What A Silver

On the TV Coverage - I would like to know when:"So and so is a 1st round pick of the Leafs" or " The Sharks can hardly wait for this guy" When did this continuous blather come to considered good hockey coverage?
It gets worse- the same guy is doing the Olympics.