What I've done is re-worked the current WHL standings to use Motiuk's proposed system, just to see how things would be different. First, the current standings the way the WHL does it now:
(I've ranked the teams by win% in order to eliminate variance in games played)
| GP | W | L | OTL | SOL | PTS | Win % | ||
| 1 | Vancouver Giants | 19 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 33 | 0.868 |
| 2 | Calgary Hitmen | 24 | 19 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 39 | 0.812 |
| 3 | Spokane Chiefs | 20 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 29 | 0.725 |
| 4 | Tri-City Americans | 21 | 14 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 0.714 |
| 5 | Saskatoon Blades | 22 | 15 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 31 | 0.705 |
| 6 | Swift Current Broncos | 22 | 14 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 0.636 |
| 7 | Brandon Wheat Kings | 20 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 25 | 0.625 |
| 7 | Regina Pats | 24 | 13 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 30 | 0.625 |
| 9 | Medicine Hat Tigers | 22 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 26 | 0.591 |
| 10 | Kelowna Rockets | 21 | 12 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 0.571 |
| 11 | Everett Silvertips | 21 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 23 | 0.548 |
| 12 | Kootenay Ice | 24 | 10 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 25 | 0.521 |
| 13 | Prince Albert Raiders | 25 | 13 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 0.520 |
| 14 | Kamloops Blazers | 23 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 23 | 0.500 |
| 15 | Lethbridge Hurricanes | 20 | 9 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 0.475 |
| 16 | Edmonton Oil Kings | 24 | 9 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 21 | 0.438 |
| 17 | Prince George Cougars | 22 | 9 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 0.432 |
| 18 | Chilliwack Bruins | 21 | 7 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 0.405 |
| 18 | Seattle Thunderbirds | 21 | 7 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 0.405 |
| 20 | Red Deer Rebels | 25 | 7 | 13 | 0 | 5 | 19 | 0.380 |
| 21 | Moose Jaw Warriors | 20 | 6 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 0.325 |
| 22 | Portland Winter Hawks | 19 | 5 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0.263 |
And now, the way the standings would look using Motiuk's idea:
| GP | W | OTW | SOW | L | PTS | Win % | Shift | ||
| 1 | Vancouver Giants | 19 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 45 | 0.789 | 0 |
| 2 | Calgary Hitmen | 24 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 53 | 0.736 | 0 |
| 3 | Saskatoon Blades | 22 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 41 | 0.621 | 2 |
| 4 | Spokane Chiefs | 20 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 37 | 0.617 | -1 |
| 5 | Swift Current Broncos | 22 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 39 | 0.591 | 1 |
| 6 | Kelowna Rockets | 21 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 36 | 0.571 | 4 |
| 7 | Tri-City Americans | 21 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 34 | 0.540 | -3 |
| 8 | Brandon Wheat Kings | 20 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 32 | 0.533 | -1 |
| 9 | Regina Pats | 24 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 35 | 0.486 | -2 |
| 10 | Medicine Hat Tigers | 22 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 31 | 0.470 | -1 |
| 11 | Everett Silvertips | 21 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 26 | 0.413 | 0 |
| 12 | Prince Albert Raiders | 25 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 30 | 0.400 | 1 |
| 12 | Lethbridge Hurricanes | 20 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 24 | 0.400 | 2 |
| 14 | Kamloops Blazers | 23 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 27 | 0.391 | 0 |
| 15 | Prince George Cougars | 22 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 24 | 0.364 | 2 |
| 16 | Edmonton Oil Kings | 24 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 24 | 0.333 | 0 |
| 16 | Kootenay Ice | 24 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 24 | 0.333 | -4 |
| 18 | Seattle Thunderbirds | 21 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 17 | 0.270 | 0 |
| 19 | Moose Jaw Warriors | 20 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 16 | 0.267 | 2 |
| 20 | Portland Winter Hawks | 19 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 14 | 0.246 | 2 |
| 21 | Chilliwack Bruins | 21 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 15 | 0.238 | -3 |
| 22 | Red Deer Rebels | 25 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 16 | 0.213 | -2 |
The last column, "Shift", is the number of places up or down in the overall standings that the team would move from their current position if Motiuk's system was used. So the biggest beneficiary of this system would be Kelowna, who are 4 positions better using this method, while the biggest drop is Kootenay, who drop four places.
A quick explanation about the winning % calculation too since you can see the winning percentage is different in the second method. I have calculated winning % in Motiuk's method as a "points percentage", the same as it is in the current standings. It's not a reflection on the number of games a team actually wins, but rather the percentage of possible points they actually get. Each game is worth three points maximum so a team that has played 20 games could have a maximum of 60 points. Thus, they would need 30 points to be a .500 team and so on.
I'm off to recalculate last year's final standings now using this method. I'll post those results later this afternoon when I'm done.
UPDATE: I've redone last year's final standings using Motiuk's idea...
Last year's final standings the way the WHL counts it up:
| GP | W | L | OTL | SOL | PTS | Win % | ||
| 1 | Tri-City Americans | 72 | 52 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 108 | 0.750 |
| 2 | Spokane Chiefs | 72 | 50 | 15 | 1 | 6 | 107 | 0.743 |
| 3 | Vancouver Giants | 72 | 49 | 15 | 2 | 6 | 106 | 0.736 |
| 4 | Calgary Hitmen | 72 | 47 | 20 | 1 | 4 | 99 | 0.688 |
| 5 | Lethbridge Hurricanes | 72 | 45 | 21 | 2 | 4 | 96 | 0.667 |
| 6 | Regina Pats | 72 | 44 | 22 | 4 | 2 | 94 | 0.653 |
| 7 | Medicine Hat Tigers | 72 | 43 | 22 | 5 | 2 | 93 | 0.646 |
| 8 | Kootenay Ice | 72 | 42 | 22 | 5 | 3 | 92 | 0.639 |
| 9 | Seattle Thunderbirds | 72 | 42 | 23 | 5 | 2 | 91 | 0.632 |
| 10 | Brandon Wheat Kings | 72 | 42 | 24 | 3 | 3 | 90 | 0.625 |
| 11 | Swift Current Broncos | 72 | 41 | 24 | 1 | 6 | 89 | 0.618 |
| 12 | Moose Jaw Warriors | 72 | 37 | 21 | 6 | 8 | 88 | 0.611 |
| 13 | Kelowna Rockets | 72 | 38 | 26 | 2 | 6 | 84 | 0.583 |
| 14 | Everett Silvertips | 72 | 39 | 30 | 0 | 3 | 81 | 0.562 |
| 15 | Saskatoon Blades | 72 | 29 | 34 | 3 | 6 | 67 | 0.465 |
| 16 | Chilliwack Bruins | 72 | 28 | 35 | 4 | 5 | 65 | 0.451 |
| 17 | Kamloops Blazers | 72 | 27 | 41 | 2 | 2 | 58 | 0.403 |
| 18 | Prince Albert Raiders | 72 | 26 | 41 | 3 | 2 | 57 | 0.396 |
| 19 | Edmonton Oil Kings | 72 | 22 | 39 | 4 | 7 | 55 | 0.382 |
| 20 | Prince George Cougars | 72 | 20 | 48 | 1 | 3 | 44 | 0.306 |
| 21 | Red Deer Rebels | 72 | 18 | 47 | 4 | 3 | 43 | 0.299 |
| 22 | Portland Winter Hawks | 72 | 11 | 58 | 2 | 1 | 25 | 0.174 |
And the final standings they way they would be using Motiuk's system:
| GP | W | OTW | SOW | L | PTS | Win % | Shift | ||
| 1 | Vancouver Giants | 72 | 44 | 3 | 2 | 23 | 140 | 0.648 | 2 |
| 2 | Spokane Chiefs | 72 | 44 | 1 | 5 | 22 | 139 | 0.644 | 0 |
| 3 | Tri-City Americans | 72 | 41 | 5 | 6 | 20 | 139 | 0.644 | -2 |
| 4 | Calgary Hitmen | 72 | 41 | 3 | 3 | 25 | 132 | 0.611 | 0 |
| 5 | Lethbridge Hurricanes | 72 | 38 | 2 | 5 | 27 | 123 | 0.569 | 0 |
| 6 | Seattle Thunderbirds | 72 | 39 | 1 | 2 | 30 | 121 | 0.560 | 3 |
| 7 | Medicine Hat Tigers | 72 | 35 | 5 | 3 | 29 | 118 | 0.546 | 0 |
| 8 | Brandon Wheat Kings | 72 | 37 | 1 | 4 | 30 | 117 | 0.542 | 2 |
| 9 | Regina Pats | 72 | 32 | 5 | 7 | 28 | 113 | 0.523 | -3 |
| 10 | Kootenay Ice | 72 | 31 | 6 | 5 | 30 | 110 | 0.509 | -2 |
| 11 | Swift Current Broncos | 72 | 30 | 7 | 4 | 31 | 108 | 0.500 | 0 |
| 12 | Everett Silvertips | 72 | 29 | 6 | 4 | 33 | 103 | 0.477 | 2 |
| 13 | Kelowna Rockets | 72 | 29 | 4 | 5 | 34 | 100 | 0.463 | 0 |
| 14 | Moose Jaw Warriors | 72 | 28 | 4 | 5 | 35 | 97 | 0.449 | -2 |
| 15 | Saskatoon Blades | 72 | 23 | 3 | 3 | 43 | 78 | 0.361 | 0 |
| 16 | Chilliwack Bruins | 72 | 23 | 1 | 4 | 44 | 75 | 0.347 | 0 |
| 17 | Kamloops Blazers | 72 | 22 | 1 | 4 | 45 | 72 | 0.333 | 0 |
| 17 | Prince Albert Raiders | 72 | 22 | 2 | 2 | 46 | 72 | 0.333 | 1 |
| 19 | Edmonton Oil Kings | 72 | 18 | 0 | 4 | 50 | 58 | 0.269 | 0 |
| 20 | Prince George Cougars | 72 | 17 | 1 | 2 | 52 | 55 | 0.255 | 0 |
| 21 | Red Deer Rebels | 72 | 12 | 1 | 5 | 54 | 43 | 0.199 | 0 |
| 22 | Portland Winter Hawks | 72 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 61 | 29 | 0.134 | 0 |
Seattle would gain the most, being three positions higher in the standings. Regina would lose the most, being three positions lower. Tri-City would not have been first overall, they would have been third and Vancouver would have been #1.
But would any of the playoff matchups last year have been affected? As it was we had:
Calgary vs. Moose Jaw
Regina vs. Swift Current
Lethbridge vs. Brandon
Medicine Hat vs. Kootenay
Tri-City vs. Kamloops
Vancouver vs. Chilliwack
Spokane vs. Everett
Seattle vs. Kelowna
With the alternate system, we would have seen:
Calgary vs. Moose Jaw
Brandon vs. Swift Current
Lethbridge vs. Kootenay
Medicine Hat vs. Regina
Vancouver vs. Kamloops
Spokane vs. Chilliwack
Tri-City vs. Kelowna
Seattle vs. Everett
So the matchups would have been completely different. Only #1 vs. #8 in the Eastern conference, Calgary vs Moose Jaw, would have remained the same. Most notable is that not only would Regina not have been the #2 seed, they wouldn't even have had home ice advantage in the first round.
An interesting proposal, for sure. Thoughts?
1 comment:
Just reading the results some might say it changes nothing. If the system was actually in place the difference would be much higher as teams would be fighting for the 3 point regulation win. To often you see teams almost play for overtime and take no chances at all. I am a huge supporter of this system.
Post a Comment