Here are this year's numbers.
For purposes of these calculations, I have assumed that in order to make the playoffs this season, a team in the Eastern conference is going to need 65 points, and a team in the West is going to need 68 points. This is different from most past years, where it has been much easier to make the playoffs in the West than in the East. But the West is ultra-competitive this year, while the East is showing a fairly standard dispersal of good vs bad teams.
So without any further blathering, the Eastern conference:
| Record to Date | Record needed for 65 Pts | |
| 1. Saskatoon Blades | 33-10-2 (0.756) | 0-27-0 (0.000) |
| 2. Kootenay Ice | 30-13-3 (0.685) | 1-25-0 (0.038) |
| 3. Red Deer Rebels | 29-12-5 (0.685) | 1-25-0 (0.038) |
| 4. Medicine Hat Tigers | 28-14-2 (0.659) | 3-24-1 (0.125) |
| 5. Moose Jaw Warriors | 28-17-2 (0.617) | 3-21-1 (0.140) |
| 6. Swift Current Broncos | 23-25-1 (0.480) | 9-14-0 (0.391) |
| 7. Edmonton Oil Kings | 22-21-2 (0.511) | 9-17-1 (0.352) |
| 8. Prince Albert Raiders | 19-24-5 (0.448) | 11-13-0 (0.458) |
| 9. Lethbridge Hurricanes | 15-21-9 (0.433) | 13-14-0 (0.481) |
| 10. Regina Pats | 16-23-6 (0.422) | 13-13-1 (0.500) |
| 11. Brandon Wheat Kings | 14-25-8 (0.383) | 14-10-1 (0.580) |
| 12. Calgary Hitmen | 14-28-3 (0.344) | 17-10-0 (0.630) |
And the Western conference:
| Record to Date | Record needed for 68 Pts | |
| 1. Spokane Chiefs | 28-11-5 (0.693) | 3-24-1 (0.125) |
| 2. Portland Winterhawks | 29-14-3 (0.663) | 3-22-1 (0.135) |
| 3. Tri-City Americans | 28-12-3 (0.686) | 4-24-1 (0.155) |
| 4. Vancouver Giants | 22-19-5 (0.533) | 9-16-1 (0.365) |
| 5. Kelowna Rockets | 24-20-0 (0.545) | 10-18-0 (0.357) |
| 6. Prince George Cougars | 22-20-3 (0.522) | 10-16-1 (0.389) |
| 7. Seattle Thunderbirds | 18-19-9 (0.489) | 11-14-1 (0.442) |
| 8. Kamloops Blazers | 21-25-2 (0.458) | 12-12-0 (0.500) |
| 9. Chilliwack Bruins | 20-20-3 (0.500) | 12-16-1 (0.431) |
| 10. Everett Silvertips | 18-21-6 (0.467) | 13-14-0 (0.481) |
As you can see, it can be argued that the Saskatoon Blades have already made the playoffs. They already have 68 points so if 65 is all that will be needed to finish in the top 8 teams in the East, then Saskatoon can lose all their remaining games and still be in the postseason, albeit likely as the #8 seed.
Similarly, Kootenay and Red Deer only need one more win each to "assure" themselves of a playoff spot.
What I like best about this year's number is the difference between the two conferences. If you look at the West, every single team in the conference can make the playoffs without having to play much better than they have to date. And if you look at the current standings, every single team in the conference does have a claim to a playoff spot right now, either through actual points or through games-in-hand. So the West is most interesting in that two teams are going to fall short of those seemingly attainable stretch records and thus miss the playoffs.
The East is more conventional - some teams can coast and still make it, some teams need only maintain their current pace (more or less) to make it, and some teams need major improvement to make it. Saskatoon is one extreme; at the other end, you look at Brandon and Calgary, teams that are .383 and .344 so far, and they probably need to play .580 and .630 hockey the rest of the way to make it. Tall order there, huh.
3 comments:
Stretch records is one of your write-ups I look forward to - thanks for your hard work!
Go Ams!
Sorry, Alan, but I am confused. How is 13-13-1 a .500 record but 12-12-0 isnt?
Jarred - you're confused? I'm confused!!! :-)
I must have spent five minutes staring at it, I could not figure out what I did wrong there....so I went to recalculate everything and then it hit me - I used 65 points as the basis for the Western Conference winning % calculations, same as the East. So all the Western winning percentages were wrong.
I have fixed them. Good catch....
Post a Comment